Subject	1800rwhp (n/m)
Posted by	SpooledUpZ on January 05, 2005 at 11:02 PM
	This message has been viewed 34 times.
In Reply To	What's the magic HP number to warrant a 3" exhaust? (n/m) posted by mr. zed line on January 05, 2005 at 10:51 PM
Message
Follow Ups	What's the magic HP number to warrant a 3" exhaust? (n/m) - mr. zed line 22:51:18 01/05/05 876.456rwhp (n/m) - Tissan© 22:52:17 01/05/05 i thought it was 879.666? (n/m) - Rbadger 22:55:38 01/05/05 no moron. (n/m) - Tissan© 22:59:04 01/05/05 Both wrong, it's 3000.0000006hp. :) (n/m) - ZFreak (Dallas) 23:04:45 01/05/05 1800rwhp (n/m) - SpooledUpZ 23:02:07 01/05/05 500+ (n/m) - BradZ (FL) 23:14:17 01/05/05 not on our cars. (n/m) - Spee 23:38:38 01/05/05 brad, spee, my post was not ment for you guys! - tecnobnz 23:43:10 01/05/05 emphasis on the plus sign... - BradZ (FL) 00:07:47 01/06/05 maybe 800+ - Spee 17:33:18 01/06/05 what the hell people.... he was asking for help - tecnobnz 23:42:15 01/05/05 Well think about it, we have full dual exhaust which means - YugoBernie (NoVA) 23:57:19 01/05/05 I haven't seen any dynos that say u will make less - Slowninja(GT-675 R Inconel Z) 00:07:12 01/06/05 You can imagine whatever you like. But the fact is that - YugoBernie (NoVA) 00:35:14 01/06/05 and reduce the velocity of the gas impulse flow (n/m) - CHUNG (Dallas) 01:08:25 01/06/05 Not to be a smartass but... - hades 01:07:11 01/06/05 39.25/78.5sqin? rofl (n/m) - Snoguitar 01:21:49 01/06/05 wow a mathlete. (n/m) - SaipanZ(MP) 01:45:35 01/06/05 You are hardly a smart ass. (n/m) - SactoTodd 02:15:04 01/06/05 No... - College Boy 02:17:59 01/06/05 9.81747703125 vs. 19.6349540625 (n/m) - Snoguitar 02:22:31 01/06/05 um..yes..what I typed :) (n/m) - College Boy 02:26:55 01/06/05 9.987 != 9.817. Can't see how you came up with 9.987, typo? (n/m) - Snoguitar 02:30:12 01/06/05 oops..typo..my bad..i make a lot of them..I was wondering - College Boy 13:27:48 01/06/05 So yes... - College Boy 02:24:07 01/06/05 What the hell are you talking about? - Marshall 10:46:47 01/06/05 You forgot it's radius, not diameter... that's your problemo - Scotts94z32 11:08:41 01/06/05 Wow! That's one big exhaust pipe (n/m) - NytWolf 12:25:31 01/06/05 Two 2.5" pipes flow slightly more than a single 3.5" pipe. (n/m) - Snoguitar 01:18:24 01/06/05 easy way to figure it out - Marshall 10:54:12 01/06/05 According to Garrett researchers... >>> - Scotts94z32 10:53:40 01/06/05
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.